Recent posts

#21
Free Energy / Re: Romero Experiments
Last post by blackchisel97 - March 28, 2022, 06:23:15 PM
Quote from: thaelin on September 18, 2021, 05:53:56 PM
     Have now finished the build of page 16 here. And it is living up to all he said. You will have to monitor it very close not to cook the bats.  At present, I have bat1 in place and it is already going up. If anyone is reading this post, jump in and lets make this thing go viral. I really feel it will work. So far, it is. Time will tell.

I've been working on this idea for a while but got only one battery to experiment with. I hauled all my batteries (3/4Ton) away over the past couple years and ended up with one in my car and one in garden tractor, which I decided to try.
I use 2 channel switching boards of my design with gate drivers and square wave generator module.
I recently designed pcb for 4017 to get rid of solderless board and jumper cables. They should be ready next week.

Still trying to find resonant spot and test different core material.
Coil has 4 x 280T AWG#23
Coil inductance 7.1mH, DC resistance 2.6 Ohm,
Laminated core 3.24 cm*2
#22
Free Energy / Re: Romero Experiments
Last post by thaelin - September 18, 2021, 05:53:56 PM
     Have now finished the build of page 16 here. And it is living up to all he said. You will have to monitor it very close not to cook the bats.  At present, I have bat1 in place and it is already going up. If anyone is reading this post, jump in and lets make this thing go viral. I really feel it will work. So far, it is. Time will tell.
#23
Free Energy / Re: Romero Experiments
Last post by thaelin - September 15, 2021, 04:32:19 PM
Hi Romero:
   I am playing with the circuit of post #230. Just curious if there is a way to tune down the on time of the mosfets as they get really hot. I am feeling that they are on way past the time needed to saturate the  coils. Just a waste of power there.  Would the circuits for regular 555's work good for the cmos versions too? If so, can institute a shorter on time.  Not sure tho if that would reflect to the bcd. Maybe just a faster frequency to shut it off quicker.
  Anyhow, hope you are having a great time with family. That is precious time.

thay
#24
Free Energy / Re: Romero Experiments
Last post by Romero - August 30, 2021, 06:07:56 PM
Hi,

Many projects started but I had no time to finish any.
Hopefully I will finalise some soon.

I have been full time grand father and that requires all my time.

Kind regards,

Romero
#25
Free Energy / Re: Romero Experiments
Last post by landownunder - August 27, 2021, 06:27:31 AM
Hi Romero
Wondering when you are going to release free energy again
Thanks Ron
#26
Free Energy / Re: Romero Experiments
Last post by Romero - February 18, 2021, 10:04:49 AM
Other work in progress..
#27
Free Energy / Re: Romero Experiments
Last post by Romero - October 06, 2020, 03:57:39 PM
@martindoten - this is the circuit you asked for.
#28
Schematics diagrams. / Re: Schematic self run system.
Last post by thaelin - August 05, 2020, 11:26:59 PM
   @Romero
   You got the bug and it is one you will never be free of. There will always be another thing to try. As with me as well. I want to thank you for leaving all this great info up to reflect on. I will be reverting back to an old thread and trying a new idea on it. No questions as you have answered most of what is needed anyhow.
   If things look promising, I will revive that thread or maybe just start another.

thay
#29
Schematics diagrams. / Re: Schematic self run system.
Last post by Romero - January 13, 2020, 03:20:19 PM
Quote from: kwag on December 25, 2019, 08:50:46 PM
Any updates to any of the  self running circuits on this thread?

Thanks

Hi,
I have not done any experiments for a long time. End of last year I have restarted few of them.
I will post some info in the near future. Just waiting to have something properly done and functioning...
#30
Schematics diagrams. / Re: Schematic self run system.
Last post by kwag - December 25, 2019, 08:50:46 PM
Any updates to any of the  self running circuits on this thread?

Thanks